On August 24, 2021, auditors who were commissioned by the Arizona Senate to forensically review the 2020 presidential election results emanating from Arizona’s Maricopa County, appeared before that state’s Senate to reveal their findings. I was unable to watch the proceedings live because of a previous commitment. The next morning, before watching the Senate hearing from beginning to end, I searched up what the left-wing media had reported about the audit. I pulled up at least ten articles on the subject and to a T, the conclusion was the same in every single one. “Arizona audit proves there was no fraud, and Biden won by an even greater margin.” I must admit, it was a little demoralizing reading article after article dissembling the same narrative, but upon reviewing the audit hearing myself, I quickly realized what I already knew: the left-wing media was promulgating propaganda, something they do with alacrity. It must be acknowledged that the audit report was a weak presentation at best; but the auditors had been repeatedly warned by Arizona officials (except for a few patriots like Senator Wendy Rogers, and State Representative Mark Finchem) that the report needed to be watered down. This should have been expected, because the senate president Karen Fann had announced repeatedly that the audit was not about overturning or decertifying the election, it was only about “election integrity.” Despite this, there is no way the final audit report could have been honestly described by the left as a “no fraud-win for Biden.”
In my article, Usurper-In-Chief, I argued that the Arizona audit report would reveal hundreds of thousands of illegal votes. That prediction was based on the idea that fraudulent ballots could be distinguished from legal ballots via a thorough, if only partial, forensic audit of the election-related data which would consist of a four-step analysis:
1) A hand recount of all the ballots counted in Maricopa County by voter tabulation machines and a review of all the envelopes in which the mail-in ballots were returned.
2) A door-to-door canvas of voters in Maricopa County to verify that the voters who were recorded as voting had voted.
3) An analysis of all the voting machines to insure there was no hacking, manipulation, or irregularities found on the equipment.
4) An analysis of the photo images taken of each ballot by high-resolution cameras.
Of these four steps, the auditors were only able to present their findings on the first step, the hand recount of the ballots and the review of the envelopes. The results of which will be addressed momentarily.
Step two, the door-to-door canvasing of voters, was scrapped, in part, because Arizona republicans were threatened with criminal sanctions by Biden’s Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ erroneously invoked Section 11(b) of the 1965 Voting Rights Act which prohibits the intimidation of voters to keep them from voting or coercing voters to vote a particular way; however, this law has nothing to do with talking to voters after they’ve voted, for if it had then many in the media would have been incarcerated for conducting exit polls, asking people how they voted as they exited voting places. In fact, it was Biden’s DOJ that did exactly what the law prohibited, as it threatened, intimidated, and tried to coerce Arizona senators into dropping this part of the election audit, which was being conducted to ensure that Arizona elections were free and fair.
Fortunately, an independent group of concerned Arizonans, led by Liz Harris, took it upon themselves to conduct a canvas of voters in Maricopa County and that canvas concluded that over 296,000 votes appeared to be illegal in this one county alone.
The third leg of the audit was severely hindered by Maricopa election officials, who intentionally deleted millions of files and records from the voting equipment the day before the equipment was turned over to the auditors; this was in violation of federal law which requires that all voter related files be retained for a minimum of 22 months after the election. Additionally, Maricopa democrats would never turn over the routers and passwords, in defiance of a court order. There can really be only one explanation as to why Maricopa democrats would engage in these two overt acts of criminal behavior and that would be to cover up greater criminality.
The final phase of the audit is to determine the authenticity of the ballots cast in Arizona, by using high-resolution camera technology invented by Jovan Pulitzer. At the time the final audit report was presented to the Arizona senate, this analysis had not yet been completed; however, these results will soon be made available, and will confirm that thousands of ballots were either illegal or fraudulent. Below is a diagram created by Mr. Pulitzer illustrating what the audit has uncovered thus far.
The percentages of possible illegal or fraudulent votes shown above have been translated into numbers of votes below:
Because some of these vote categories most probably overlap, Mr. Pulitzer estimated that at least 700,000 ballots were either fraudulent or illegal. If correct, this would mean that fifteen felonies were potentially committed in Maricopa County during the election.
The completion of Phase One of the audit – the hand count of the ballots and a review of the return mail-in ballot envelopes – revealed numerous anomalies. First, the hand count of all the paper ballots resulted in Biden’s raw vote total increasing by 99 votes and Trump’s raw vote total decreasing by 261; but this was the only part of the audit favorable to Biden. Of course, it was the only thing reported by liberal news outlets; as they all claimed that the audit had not only shown there was no election fraud in Arizona, but that Biden had beaten Trump in Maricopa County by a wider margin than originally thought. This was the same media that had claimed the audit was unprofessional, unreliable, biased and could not be trusted. Now they were reporting the audit had proven Biden had won. Furthermore, if as the leftists had claimed, the audit was fraudulent (and not the election) then why would a fraudulent audit acknowledge that the hand count of the ballots had revealed that Biden had received more votes? Now, here is what the left-wing loons failed to report: The audit also found that almost 57,000 of those votes were probably illegal; 255,326 ballots had no record of being requested by voters or being mailed to voters by Maricopa County but somehow had been inserted into the election process. The media also failed to mention that more than half of all the election data on the voting equipment had been deleted, which had prompted a criminal investigation by Arizona’s Attorney General. The audit also found troubling issues with the mail-in ballot return envelopes. Currently a voter’s signature on the return envelope containing a mail-in ballot is the only way to verify if an enclosed ballot is legitimate, yet while many of the ballot envelopes had no signature, those ballots were counted anyway. It was further discovered that signatures on mail-in ballot envelopes received in the 4 weeks prior to election day (during early voting) were 95% legible and 5% illegible, while those received during the 4 days after election day (all of which were counted) were 95% illegible and 5% legible. There were also 17,322 duplicate mail-in ballots that were counted and more that 6,500 mail-in ballots that had no envelopes.
The easiest and most effective way to orchestrate a fraudulent election is by mail-in ballots. In most states, the only obstacle between a real vote and a fraudulent vote is a signature. In an U.S. court of law, a petty thief accused of writing a $100.00 fraudulent check would have his signature scrutinized by a handwriting expert to determine whether the signature on the check were real or a forgery, but, across America, our election system confers on volunteers or even worse, political operatives, the title of Handwriting Expert, thereby giving them the authority to determine not only the authenticity of a vote but ultimately the destiny of a nation. It is absurd. All voting should be done in person with proof of identification. This would not prevent all fraud, but it would force voter fraud to be perpetrated in person than rather than anonymously by mail.
How would election fraud using mail-in ballots be carried out? First, a list of all the registered voters would be obtained. These lists are readily available in every state and in most cases, anyone can obtain a list for free. Only a few jurisdictions charge a fee; however, the lists are universally made available to political parties at no cost. Next, there would be four years before the next election to increase the number of registered voters on the roles with “ghost voters,” i.e., people who have moved, who are underaged, who have died and those who are convicted felons, etc. This would explain why people were “voting” from vacant lots, commercial buildings, P.O. boxes, and from the homes of other residents. Concurrently, the voting history of legitimately registered voters would be researched and those who rarely or never vote would be identified (again this information is easily obtained). Then hundreds of thousands of fraudulent ballots would be filled out on behalf of these unsuspecting voters and mailed in for the candidate to be fraudulently elected. This would explain why some voters attempting to vote in person on election day were prohibited from voting -- because the official record showed they had already voted by mail-in ballot. Finally, there would be thousands more fraudulent ballots held in reserve just in case the opposition candidate overperformed. This could explain how Trump, who was winning by significant margins on election night in almost every swing state, would later end up losing in most of those states. Furthermore, the insertion of illegal ballots into the election process by democrats might explain why they deleted almost 51% of the election-related data from the voting machines in Arizona. Biden supposedly got 47.7% of the vote and Trump 47.3%. In a race this close, a batch of ballots would be closely divided between the two candidates with a few rare anomalies where one candidate might get 60% of the vote and the other 40%. So, if one candidate received 100% of the tabulated vote in any batch of votes, it would be prima facia evidence of voter fraud and a review of the election data would verify this.
Democrats now claim that questioning the outcome of an election in America is “shameful.” Of course, they weren’t saying that when Hillary Clinton traveled the world making a similar claim about the 2016 election. Democrats now say questioning our election process is what corrupt regimes in other countries do. This of course is a non sequitur. Corrupt regimes engage in fraudulent elections with regularity, to have an opposition party remain silent about the fraud makes it no less fraudulent. Democrats call the claim of concerned citizens that the election was stolen from Trump the “big lie.” So, was the democrat claim that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the presidential election in 2016 the truth? No, it was a big lie. Was it Russian disinformation that Hunter Biden’s laptop had been discovered, revealing that he was peddling influence on behalf of the Biden family for huge sums of money from foreign governments? No, that too was a big lie. Was the claim true, that it was impossible for Covid-19 to have escaped from a virology lab in Wuhan, China? No, another big lie. Was it true that the frantic evacuation from Afghanistan was a phenomenal success? Still, another big lie. So clearly, democrats find it difficult to distinguish between the truth and a lie.
In the final analysis, while it is remotely possible that Biden won Arizona, only because almost anything is possible, it is highly improbable. The audit has thus far confirmed what informed, honest Americans already knew – the democrats cheated, and Trump was the real winner of Arizona. If evidence of election fraud is allowed to see the light of day in Arizona and other swing states, the probability that Trump was cheated out of the presidency will become even more evident. All democrats and many republicans have a vested interest in shutting down election audits. Democrats will be exposed as criminals and many republicans will be impugned for allowing the fraud to happen. As politicians worry about being exposed for their culpability in what may be the worst election fraud in American history, the American people wonder if the country can survive four years of a Joe Biden administration or worse, a Kamala Harris presidency.
What ever happened to "An analysis of the photo images taken of each ballot by high-resolution cameras"
LOL.